Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:51

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Pacers’ Tyrese Haliburton stuns Thunder in last second to open NBA Finals - The Washington Post
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Astronomers Astonished by Largest Explosion Since the Big Bang - futurism.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why do I want to be caught sucking dick by my wife?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Utah now one of 36 states that have seen measles cases this year - Deseret News
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Have you ever been forced to undress for money just once?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is facing trial — and these eccentric sketch artists - The Washington Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?